Cedric Le Goater <clg at fr.ibm.com> writes: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Cedric Le Goater <clg at fr.ibm.com> writes: >> >>> Eric W. Biederman wrote: >>> >>> [ ... ] >>> >>>> Cedric sorry for not saying so earlier, but I thought that the > incompleteness >>>> was obvious. >>> No worries :) But let's see how obvious is that incompleteness before we >>> add more work to it. >> >> Sorry I don't understand what you mean. >> Are you suggesting not fixing bugs because everyone cannot see them? > > I'm only suggesting to wait for the opinion of the vserver and openvz guys. > > If it's already useful for someone, good. if not, let's work on it when we > have time. if they are bugs, let's fix them. > > just being pragmatic on what to do because I'd like to spend more time on > the process namespace which really is a must have to do anything else. As an ordering suggest that sounds fine. That is the other reason I barely looked at it. :( Eric
