On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 03:07:37 -0600 ebiederm at xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > Andrew Morton <akpm at osdl.org> writes: > > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:05:27 -0600 > > "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm at xmission.com> wrote: > > > >> By not rolling our own inode we get a little more code reuse, > >> and things get a little simpler and we don't have special > >> cases to contend with later. > > > > On a standard FC5 install (which has selinux enabled) things get very ugly. > > > > udev: MAKEDEV: mkdir: file exists > > > > followed by a stream of udev errors of various sorts and then an infinite > > loop of auditd complaints about klogd and "/" and tmpfs. Nothing makes it > > to logs because klogd itself is failing. > > I'm not feeling very generous today. I'm wondering what selinux bug > I have found now. Without selinux everything is fine on FC5. > > Any chance of a search through that patchset to see which patch selinux > trips on? > This one. "PATCH 4/7] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven."