merged both patches into cifs-2.6.git for-next pending additional testing On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 9:05 AM Ivan Abramov <i.abramov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There is an unnecessary NULL check of cifs_sb in smb2_is_path_accessible(), > since cifs_sb is dereferenced multiple times prior to it. > > It seems that there is no need to introduce any NULL checks of cifs_sb, > since arguments of smb2_is_path_accessible() are assumed to be non-NULL. > > Therefore, this redundant check can be removed. > > Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. > > Signed-off-by: Ivan Abramov <i.abramov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c b/fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c > index 4dd11eafb69d..6958825431af 100644 > --- a/fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c > +++ b/fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c > @@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ smb2_is_path_accessible(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon, > if (islink) > rc = -EREMOTE; > } > - if (rc == -EREMOTE && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL) && cifs_sb && > + if (rc == -EREMOTE && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CIFS_DFS_UPCALL) && > (cifs_sb->mnt_cifs_flags & CIFS_MOUNT_NO_DFS)) > rc = -EOPNOTSUPP; > goto out; > -- > 2.39.5 > > -- Thanks, Steve
