On Sunday 23 February 2025 18:48:50 Steve French wrote: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 4:23 PM Pali Rohár <pali@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hello Steve, I see that you have merged first two changes (1/4 and 2/4) > > from this patch series, but the remaining (3/4 and 4/4). Is there any > > reason why 3/4 and 4/4 was not taken? > > Mainly because I wasn't able to easily test it, and didn't get test > feedback for anyone else > on those two who had tried it. > > I am ok with looking at them again - and thx for rebasing. Ok, when you have a time, please look at them. > There are some of the 41 patches in your updated cifs branch that do look suitable or rc5 There is "cifs: Change translation of STATUS_DELETE_PENDING to -EBUSY" which stops returning -ENOENT for directory entry which still exists. > > > On Sunday 22 December 2024 15:58:41 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Name surrogate reparse point represents another named entity in the system. > > > > > > If the name surrogate reparse point is not handled by Linux SMB client > > > and it is of directory type then treat it as a new mount point. > > > > > > Cleanup code for all explicit surrogate reparse points (like reparse > > > points with tag IO_REPARSE_TAG_MOUNT_POINT) as they are handled by > > > generic name surrogate reparse point code. > > > > > > Pali Rohár (4): > > > cifs: Throw -EOPNOTSUPP error on unsupported reparse point type from > > > parse_reparse_point() > > > cifs: Treat unhandled directory name surrogate reparse points as mount > > > directory nodes > > > cifs: Remove explicit handling of IO_REPARSE_TAG_MOUNT_POINT in > > > inode.c > > > cifs: Improve handling of name surrogate reparse points in reparse.c > > > > > > fs/smb/client/inode.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- > > > fs/smb/client/reparse.c | 24 ++++++++++-------------- > > > fs/smb/common/smbfsctl.h | 3 +++ > > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.20.1 > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve
