Regression with getcifsacl(1) in v6.14-rc1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steve,

The commit 438e2116d7bd ("cifs: Change translation of
STATUS_PRIVILEGE_NOT_HELD to -EPERM") regressed getcifsacl(1) because it
expects -EIO to be returned from getxattr(2) when the client can't read
system.cifs_ntsd_full attribute and then fall back to system.cifs_acl
attribute.  Either -EIO or -EPERM is wrong for getxattr(2), but that's a
different problem, though.

Reproduced against samba-4.22 server.




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux