Looks good
Thanks
Meetakshi
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 10:14 PM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Coverity spotted a place where we should have been holding the
> channel lock when accessing the ses channel index.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: 1582039 ("Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/smb/client/transport.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/smb/client/transport.c b/fs/smb/client/transport.c
> index 443b4b89431d..fc0ddc75abc9 100644
> --- a/fs/smb/client/transport.c
> +++ b/fs/smb/client/transport.c
> @@ -1059,9 +1059,11 @@ struct TCP_Server_Info
> *cifs_pick_channel(struct cifs_ses *ses)
> index = (uint)atomic_inc_return(&ses->chan_seq);
> index %= ses->chan_count;
> }
> +
> + server = ses->chans[index].server;
> spin_unlock(&ses->chan_lock);
>
> - return ses->chans[index].server;
> + return server;
> }
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
