On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 16:34 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Use writepages-based flushing invalidation instead of
> invalidate_inode_pages2() and ->launder_folio(). This will allow
> ->launder_folio() to be removed eventually.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@xxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: v9fs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> cc: netfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> fs/9p/vfs_addr.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c b/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c
> index 047855033d32..5a943c122d83 100644
> --- a/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c
> +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_addr.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ static int v9fs_init_request(struct netfs_io_request *rreq, struct file *file)
> bool writing = (rreq->origin == NETFS_READ_FOR_WRITE ||
> rreq->origin == NETFS_WRITEBACK ||
> rreq->origin == NETFS_WRITETHROUGH ||
> - rreq->origin == NETFS_LAUNDER_WRITE ||
> rreq->origin == NETFS_UNBUFFERED_WRITE ||
> rreq->origin == NETFS_DIO_WRITE);
>
> @@ -141,7 +140,6 @@ const struct address_space_operations v9fs_addr_operations = {
> .dirty_folio = netfs_dirty_folio,
> .release_folio = netfs_release_folio,
> .invalidate_folio = netfs_invalidate_folio,
> - .launder_folio = netfs_launder_folio,
> .direct_IO = noop_direct_IO,
> .writepages = netfs_writepages,
> };
>
Shouldn't this include a call to filemap_invalidate_inode? Is just
removing launder_folio enough to do this?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
