Re: [PATCH 2/2] ima: evm: Rename *_post_path_mknod() to *_path_post_mknod()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:17 AM Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-03-29 at 11:56 +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> > From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Rename ima_post_path_mknod() and evm_post_path_mknod() respectively to
> > ima_path_post_mknod() and evm_path_post_mknod(), to facilitate finding
> > users of the path_post_mknod LSM hook.
> >
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 6.8.x
>
> Since commit cd3cec0a02c7 ("ima: Move to LSM infrastructure") was upstreamed in
> this open window.  This change does not need to be packported and should be
> limited to IMA and EVM full fledge LSMs.
>
> > Reported-by: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Closes:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20240328-raushalten-krass-cb040068bde9@brauner/
> > Fixes: 05d1a717ec04 ("ima: add support for creating files using the mknodat
> > syscall")
>
> "Fixes: 05d1a717ec04" should be removed.

I'd take it one step further and remove both 'Fixes' tags.  A 'Fixes'
tag implies a flaw in the functionality of the code, this is just a
function rename.

Another important thing to keep in mind about 'Fixes' tags, unless
you've told the stable kernel folks to only take patches that you've
explicitly marked for stable, they are likely going to attempt to
backport anything with a 'Fixes' tag.

Regardless, since I was looking at 1/2 I took a quick look at this
patch and it looks fine to me once the comments have been
incorporated.

Reviewed-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> > Fixes: cd3cec0a02c7 ("ima: Move to LSM infrastructure")
> > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
paul-moore.com





[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux