Greg, Sasha, Ping. On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 10:31:29AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 12:50:16AM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 01:21:45PM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 10:19:46AM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 03:33:14AM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Can you please backport this commit (below) to a stable 6.1.y tree, it's > > > > > confirmed be Kees this could cause kernel panic due to false positive > > > > > strncpy fortify, and this is already happened for some users. > > > > > > > > What is the git commit id? > > > > > > 398d5843c03261a2b68730f2f00643826bcec6ba > > > > Can you please apply this to the next 6.1.y release? > > > > There is still non-theoretical crash as reported in > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/qjyfz2xftsbch6aozgplxyjfyqnuhn7j44udrucls4pqa5ey35@adxvvrdtagqf/ > > > > If commit hash was not enough: > > > > commit 398d5843c03261a2b68730f2f00643826bcec6ba > > Author: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > AuthorDate: Tue Feb 14 16:08:39 2023 -0800 > > > > cifs: Convert struct fealist away from 1-element array > > > > The commit is in mainline and is applying well to linux-6.1.y: > > > > (linux-6.1.y)$ git cherry-pick 398d5843c03261a2b68730f2f00643826bcec6ba > > Auto-merging fs/smb/client/cifspdu.h > > Auto-merging fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c > > [linux-6.1.y 4a80b516f202] cifs: Convert struct fealist away from 1-element array > > Author: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue Feb 14 16:08:39 2023 -0800 > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > It does not apply cleanly due to renames, can you provide a backported, > and tested, patch please? Can you explain please why the patch submission [1] is silently not accepted so I could possibly resubmit it? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20240218111538.2592901-1-vt@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ It's tested to compile well and to fix the real crash. I also think the submission conforms to Option 3 of process/stable-kernel-rules.rst so I would be glad to know why if it isn't. Thanks, > > thanks, > > greg k-h
