On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 10:12:55AM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This commit (100ccd18bb41 in linux-next 20240104) is bad for me. After > > it, running xfstests gives me first a bunch of errors along these lines: > > > > 00004 depmod: ERROR: failed to load symbols from /lib/modules/6.7.0-rc7-00037-g100ccd18bb41/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko: Exec format error > > 00004 depmod: ERROR: failed to load symbols from /lib/modules/6.7.0-rc7-00037-g100ccd18bb41/kernel/fs/zonefs/zonefs.ko: Exec format error > > 00004 depmod: ERROR: failed to load symbols from /lib/modules/6.7.0-rc7-00037-g100ccd18bb41/kernel/security/keys/encrypted-keys/encrypted-keys.ko: Exec format error > > > > and then later: > > > > 00016 generic/001 run fstests generic/001 at 2024-01-05 04:50:46 > > 00017 [not run] this test requires a valid $TEST_DEV > > 00017 generic/002 run fstests generic/002 at 2024-01-05 04:50:46 > > 00017 [not run] this test requires a valid $TEST_DEV > > 00017 generic/003 run fstests generic/003 at 2024-01-05 04:50:47 > > 00018 [not run] this test requires a valid $SCRATCH_DEV > > ... > > > > so I think that's page cache corruption of some kind. > > Is that being run on NFS? Is /lib on NFS? No NFS involvement; this is supposed to be an XFS test ... /dev/sda on / type ext4 (rw,relatime) host on /host type 9p (rw,relatime,access=client,trans=virtio) /dev/sdb on /mnt/test type xfs (rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=32k,noquota) CONFIG_NETFS_SUPPORT=y # CONFIG_NETFS_STATS is not set # CONFIG_FSCACHE is not set CONFIG_NETWORK_FILESYSTEMS=y # CONFIG_NFS_FS is not set # CONFIG_NFSD is not set # CONFIG_CEPH_FS is not set # CONFIG_CIFS is not set # CONFIG_SMB_SERVER is not set # CONFIG_CODA_FS is not set # CONFIG_AFS_FS is not set CONFIG_9P_FS=y # CONFIG_9P_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set # CONFIG_9P_FS_SECURITY is not set CONFIG_NLS=y
