Jeremy Allison <jra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Further, are the two ops then essentially done atomically? > > No. They are processed (at least in Samba) as two separate > requests and can be raced by local or other remote access. So just compounding them would leave us in the same situation we are in now - which would be fine. What do you think about the idea of having the server see a specifically arranged compounded pair and turn them into an op that can't otherwise be represented in the protocol? Or is it better to try and get the protocol extended? David
