Re: [PATCH] smb: client, common: fix fortify warnings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2023-11-28 19:53 GMT+09:00, Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx>:
> When compiling with gcc version 14.0.0 20231126 (experimental)
> and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've noticed the following:
>
> In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:295,
>                  from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:12,
>                  from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
>                  from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:9,
>                  from ./include/linux/preempt.h:79,
>                  from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
>                  from ./include/linux/wait.h:9,
>                  from ./include/linux/wait_bit.h:8,
>                  from ./include/linux/fs.h:6,
>                  from fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c:18:
> In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk',
>     inlined from '__SMB2_close' at fs/smb/client/smb2pdu.c:3480:4:
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:588:25: warning: call to
> '__read_overflow2_field'
> declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd
> parameter);
> maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
>   588 |                         __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);
>       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> and:
>
> In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:295,
>                  from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:12,
>                  from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53,
>                  from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:60,
>                  from ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:9,
>                  from ./include/linux/preempt.h:79,
>                  from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:56,
>                  from ./include/linux/wait.h:9,
>                  from ./include/linux/wait_bit.h:8,
>                  from ./include/linux/fs.h:6,
>                  from fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:17:
> In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk',
>     inlined from 'CIFS_open' at fs/smb/client/cifssmb.c:1248:3:
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:588:25: warning: call to
> '__read_overflow2_field'
> declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd
> parameter);
> maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning]
>   588 |                         __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size);
>       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> In both cases, the fortification logic inteprets calls to 'memcpy()' as an
> attempts to copy an amount of data which exceeds the size of the specified
> field (i.e. more than 8 bytes from __le64 value) and thus issues an
> overread
> warning. Both of these warnings may be silenced by using the convenient
> 'struct_group()' quirk.
I'm confused by your use of the word "may" above. Did you checked if
the warnings are silenced with this patch ?

Otherwise Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@xxxxxxxxx>




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux