> can this be proposed for the next 6.6 point release? I don't see any updates to the 6.6.x stable tree in the last week - but since this patch is tagged for stable (and has "Fixes:" tag as well). It is likely to be picked up automatically. When next update to 6.6 stable tree is made (to include recent merge window patches), hopefully by Monday - we should recheck. On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 4:00 PM Eduard Bachmakov <e.bachmakov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I noticed this got pulled into 6.7. Given this is a user-facing > regression, can this be proposed for the next 6.6 point release? > Sorry, if this is already the case and I missed it. > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 6:29 PM Paulo Alcantara <pc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Eduard Bachmakov <e.bachmakov@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > I don't see is_dfs_mount() being called so in my scenario we're simply > > > relying on kzalloc initializing dfs_automount to false. > > > > It's expected. If your share is DFS and client finds a DFS link or > > reparse mount point, the dentry set for automount will get mounted with > > new fs context where where @dfs_automount will be set. > > I see, thanks. > -- Thanks, Steve
