On 6/9/2023 1:46 PM, Shyam Prasad N wrote:
iface_cmp used to simply do a memcmp of the two
provided struct sockaddrs. The comparison needs to do more
based on the address family. Similar logic was already
present in cifs_match_ipaddr. Doing something similar now.
Signed-off-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h | 37 -----------------------------
fs/smb/client/cifsproto.h | 1 +
fs/smb/client/connect.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h b/fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h
index 0d84bb1a8cd9..b212a4e16b39 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h
@@ -970,43 +970,6 @@ release_iface(struct kref *ref)
kfree(iface);
}
-/*
- * compare two interfaces a and b
- * return 0 if everything matches.
- * return 1 if a has higher link speed, or rdma capable, or rss capable
- * return -1 otherwise.
- */
-static inline int
-iface_cmp(struct cifs_server_iface *a, struct cifs_server_iface *b)
-{
- int cmp_ret = 0;
-
- WARN_ON(!a || !b);
- if (a->speed == b->speed) {
- if (a->rdma_capable == b->rdma_capable) {
- if (a->rss_capable == b->rss_capable) {
- cmp_ret = memcmp(&a->sockaddr, &b->sockaddr,
- sizeof(a->sockaddr));
- if (!cmp_ret)
- return 0;
- else if (cmp_ret > 0)
- return 1;
- else
- return -1;
- } else if (a->rss_capable > b->rss_capable)
- return 1;
- else
- return -1;
- } else if (a->rdma_capable > b->rdma_capable)
- return 1;
- else
- return -1;
- } else if (a->speed > b->speed)
- return 1;
- else
- return -1;
-}
-
struct cifs_chan {
unsigned int in_reconnect : 1; /* if session setup in progress for this channel */
struct TCP_Server_Info *server;
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/cifsproto.h b/fs/smb/client/cifsproto.h
index c1c704990b98..d127aded2f28 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/cifsproto.h
+++ b/fs/smb/client/cifsproto.h
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ extern int cifs_handle_standard(struct TCP_Server_Info *server,
struct mid_q_entry *mid);
extern int smb3_parse_devname(const char *devname, struct smb3_fs_context *ctx);
extern int smb3_parse_opt(const char *options, const char *key, char **val);
+extern int cifs_ipaddr_cmp(struct sockaddr *srcaddr, struct sockaddr *rhs);
extern bool cifs_match_ipaddr(struct sockaddr *srcaddr, struct sockaddr *rhs);
extern int cifs_discard_remaining_data(struct TCP_Server_Info *server);
extern int cifs_call_async(struct TCP_Server_Info *server,
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/connect.c b/fs/smb/client/connect.c
index 1250d156619b..9d16626e7a66 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/connect.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/connect.c
@@ -1288,6 +1288,56 @@ cifs_demultiplex_thread(void *p)
module_put_and_kthread_exit(0);
}
+int
+cifs_ipaddr_cmp(struct sockaddr *srcaddr, struct sockaddr *rhs)
Please, please, please, let's not add a new shared entry starting with
this four-letter word.
+{
+ struct sockaddr_in *saddr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)srcaddr;
+ struct sockaddr_in *vaddr4 = (struct sockaddr_in *)rhs;
+ struct sockaddr_in6 *saddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)srcaddr;
+ struct sockaddr_in6 *vaddr6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)rhs;
I don't see the value in these variables. Why not simply add the casts
in the very few places they're used?
+
+ switch (srcaddr->sa_family) {
+ case AF_UNSPEC:
+ switch (rhs->sa_family) {
+ case AF_UNSPEC:
+ return 0;
+ case AF_INET:
+ case AF_INET6:
+ return 1;
+ default:
+ return -1;
+ }
+ case AF_INET: {
+ switch (rhs->sa_family) {
+ case AF_UNSPEC:
+ return -1;
+ case AF_INET:
+ return memcmp(saddr4, vaddr4,
+ sizeof(struct sockaddr_in));
+ case AF_INET6:
+ return 1;
+ default:
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ case AF_INET6: {
+ switch (rhs->sa_family) {
+ case AF_UNSPEC:
+ case AF_INET:
+ return -1;
+ case AF_INET6:
+ return memcmp(saddr6,
+ vaddr6,
+ sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6));
+ default:
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+ default:
+ return -1; /* don't expect to be here */
+ }
+}
+
/*
* Returns true if srcaddr isn't specified and rhs isn't specified, or
* if srcaddr is specified and matches the IP address of the rhs argument
diff --git a/fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c b/fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c
index 18faf267c54d..046341115add 100644
--- a/fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c
+++ b/fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c
@@ -513,6 +513,43 @@ smb3_negotiate_rsize(struct cifs_tcon *tcon, struct smb3_fs_context *ctx)
return rsize;
}
+/*
+ * compare two interfaces a and b
+ * return 0 if everything matches.
+ * return 1 if a is rdma capable, or rss capable, or has higher link speed
+ * return -1 otherwise.
+ */
+static int
+iface_cmp(struct cifs_server_iface *a, struct cifs_server_iface *b)
+{
+ int cmp_ret = 0;
+
+ WARN_ON(!a || !b);
+ if (a->rdma_capable == b->rdma_capable) {
+ if (a->rss_capable == b->rss_capable) {
+ if (a->speed == b->speed) {
+ cmp_ret = cifs_ipaddr_cmp((struct sockaddr *) &a->sockaddr,
+ (struct sockaddr *) &b->sockaddr);
+ if (!cmp_ret)
+ return 0;
+ else if (cmp_ret > 0)
+ return 1;
+ else
+ return -1;
+ } else if (a->speed > b->speed)
+ return 1;
+ else
+ return -1;
+ } else if (a->rss_capable > b->rss_capable)
+ return 1;
+ else
+ return -1;
+ } else if (a->rdma_capable > b->rdma_capable)
+ return 1;
+ else
+ return -1;
+}
+
The { <0 / 0 / >0 } behavior of this code has been a source of
incorrect comparisons in the past, and it still makes my head hurt
to attempt a review.
So I'll ask, have you thoroughly tested this to be certain that it
doesn't result in new channels being created needlessly?
static int
parse_server_interfaces(struct network_interface_info_ioctl_rsp *buf,
size_t buf_len, struct cifs_ses *ses, bool in_mount)
Tom.
