Coverity noted a place where we were not grabbing the ses_lock when setting (and checking) ses_status. Addresses-Coverity: 1536833 ("Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)") -- Thanks, Steve
From 390c90c2928a33f2632e9d668cd3b5b769c9b1e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 22:01:31 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] cifs: missing lock when updating session status Coverity noted a place where we were not grabbing the ses_lock when setting (and checking) ses_status. Addresses-Coverity: 1536833 ("Data race condition (MISSING_LOCK)") Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/cifs/connect.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c index 1cbb90587995..cc538ed61bc0 100644 --- a/fs/cifs/connect.c +++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c @@ -1916,19 +1916,22 @@ void cifs_put_smb_ses(struct cifs_ses *ses) /* ses_count can never go negative */ WARN_ON(ses->ses_count < 0); + spin_lock(&ses->ses_lock); if (ses->ses_status == SES_GOOD) ses->ses_status = SES_EXITING; cifs_free_ipc(ses); if (ses->ses_status == SES_EXITING && server->ops->logoff) { + spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock); xid = get_xid(); rc = server->ops->logoff(xid, ses); if (rc) cifs_server_dbg(VFS, "%s: Session Logoff failure rc=%d\n", __func__, rc); _free_xid(xid); - } + } else + spin_unlock(&ses->ses_lock); spin_lock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock); list_del_init(&ses->smb_ses_list); -- 2.34.1