Hi all,
On Mon, 20 Feb 2023 11:42:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got conflicts in:
>
> fs/cifs/fscache.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 8378eea2e41f ("cifs: Change the I/O paths to use an iterator rather than a page list")
>
> from the cifs tree and commit:
>
> 220ae4a5c2ba ("cifs: use bvec_set_page to initialize bvecs")
>
> from the block tree.
>
> I fixed it up (the former removed the code updated by the latter in
> fscache_fallback_write_pages(), so I did that) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
This is now a conflict between the cifs tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpLrarm6JpEr.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
