Re: [PATCH 11/12] cifs: Fix problem with encrypted RDMA data read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 31.01.23 um 19:28 schrieb David Howells:
When the cifs client is talking to the ksmbd server by RDMA and the ksmbd
server has "smb3 encryption = yes" in its config file, the normal PDU
stream is encrypted, but the directly-delivered data isn't in the stream
(and isn't encrypted), but is rather delivered by DDP/RDMA packets (at
least with IWarp).

Currently, the direct delivery fails with:

    buf can not contain only a part of read data
    WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4619 at fs/cifs/smb2ops.c:4731 handle_read_data+0x393/0x405
    ...
    RIP: 0010:handle_read_data+0x393/0x405
    ...
     smb3_handle_read_data+0x30/0x37
     receive_encrypted_standard+0x141/0x224
     cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x21a/0x63b
     kthread+0xe7/0xef
     ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

The problem apparently stemming from the fact that it's trying to manage
the decryption, but the data isn't in the smallbuf, the bigbuf or the page
array).

This can be fixed simply by inserting an extra case into handle_read_data()
that checks to see if use_rdma_mr is true, and if it is, just setting
rdata->got_bytes to the length of data delivered and allowing normal
continuation.

This can be seen in an IWarp packet trace.  With the upstream code, it does
a DDP/RDMA packet, which produces the warning above and then retries,
retrieving the data inline, spread across several SMBDirect messages that
get glued together into a single PDU.  With the patch applied, only the
DDP/RDMA packet is seen.

Note that this doesn't happen if the server isn't told to encrypt stuff and
it does also happen with softRoCE.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
cc: Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>
cc: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@xxxxxxxxx>
cc: linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166855224228.1998592.2212551359609792175.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ # v1
---
  fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
index cea578a45ed8..73b66ac86abf 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
@@ -4733,6 +4733,9 @@ handle_read_data(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct mid_q_entry *mid,
  		if (length < 0)
  			return length;
  		rdata->got_bytes = data_len;
+	} else if (use_rdma_mr) {
+		/* The data was delivered directly by RDMA. */
+		rdata->got_bytes = data_len;

I actually don't understand why this would only be a problem with encryption.

I guess there's much more needed and data_offset should most likely be
ignored completely in the rdma offload case. So I'd guess its just luck
that we don't trigger the below warning/error more often.

  	} else {
  		/* read response payload cannot be in both buf and pages */
  		WARN_ONCE(1, "buf can not contain only a part of read data");





[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux