[PATCH v2 5/5] cifs: handle cache lookup errors different than -ENOENT

[Paulo Alcantara <pc@xxxxxx>]

lookup_cache_entry() might return an error different than -ENOENT
(e.g. from ->char2uni), so handle those as well in
cache_refresh_path().

Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@xxxxxx>
---
 fs/cifs/dfs_cache.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/dfs_cache.c b/fs/cifs/dfs_cache.c
index 58d11be9d020..308101d90006 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/dfs_cache.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/dfs_cache.c
@@ -644,7 +644,9 @@ static struct cache_entry *__lookup_cache_entry(const char *path, unsigned int h
  *
  * Use whole path components in the match.  Must be called with htable_rw_lock held.
  *
+ * Return cached entry if successful.
  * Return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT) if the entry is not found.
+ * Return error ptr otherwise.
  */
 static struct cache_entry *lookup_cache_entry(const char *path)
 {
@@ -789,8 +791,13 @@ static struct cache_entry *cache_refresh_path(const unsigned int xid,
 	down_read(&htable_rw_lock);
 
 	ce = lookup_cache_entry(path);
-	if (!IS_ERR(ce) && !force_refresh && !cache_entry_expired(ce))
+	if (!IS_ERR(ce)) {
+		if (!force_refresh && !cache_entry_expired(ce))
+			return ce;
+	} else if (PTR_ERR(ce) != -ENOENT) {
+		up_read(&htable_rw_lock);
 		return ce;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * Unlock shared access as we don't want to hold any locks while getting
@@ -822,7 +829,7 @@ static struct cache_entry *cache_refresh_path(const unsigned int xid,
 			if (rc)
 				ce = ERR_PTR(rc);
 		}
-	} else {
+	} else if (PTR_ERR(ce) == -ENOENT) {
 		ce = add_cache_entry_locked(refs, numrefs);
 	}
 
-- 
2.39.0