Re: RFC: remove cifs_writepage

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 06:22:12PM -0600, Steve French wrote:
> Ran some tests today with the three patch (remove writepage for
> cifs.ko) series.  Let me know if any updates for those.  Also let me
> know which gti branch you would like to see these merged from (mine or
> yours e.g.)

If they work and look fine to you please queue them up in the cifs
tree as-is.

> I did see an intermittent  failure (when run with these three patches)
> that doesn't appear to be obviously related to yours but am still
> investigating it.   Test 043 failed once, and on one of retries of the
> group  -  test 045 failed once. See example below.  This looks related
> to an issue with deferred close (handle leases) and reference counts
> holding up unmount, and not related to these patches (at least at
> first glance).   Continuing to debug

Yes.  I have no good idea but to may suggest what NFS does about
silly renamed inodes to ensure they don't try to get in the way
of mount.



[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux