On 09/18, Enzo Matsumiya wrote:
but if we consider that other messages with status != STATUS_SUCCESS have their signatures correctly computed (apparently), then I'd guess there's something wrong with computing signatures for STATUS_END_OF_FILE responses.
Correcting myself here: messages with status != STATUS_SUCCESS and != STATUS_END_OF_FILE take different path that never reaches ->calc_signature().
Sent this just now: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/20220918235442.2981-1-ematsumiya@xxxxxxx/T/#u
So I guess this patch is sufficient for now. Cheers, Enzo
