https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15136 --- Comment #2 from wangrong <wangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi, Thanks for your reply and suggestion I want to explain the design intent of wait_reconnect_timeout, it is used to set the strategy for the application to wait for reconnection. wait_reconnect_timeout == 0, the application does not want to wait, and returns as soon as it detects that the connection is unavailable. 0 < wait_reconnect_timeout <= sk_rcvtimeo, the application wants to try to wait, but is not guaranteed to complete a connection attempt. sk_rcvtimeo < wait_reconnect_timeout, the application wants to make sure a connection attempt completes. This is the behavior of the current code, but providing the wait_reconnect_timeout mount option gives the application more choices. Would it be better to provide both sk_rcvtimeo and wait_reconnect_timeout mount options? it avoids hardcode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.