Re: [PATCH 4/5] ksmbd: use wait_event instead of schedule_timeout()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2022-07-25 9:48 GMT+09:00, Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2022년 7월 22일 (금) 오후 12:04, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
>>
>> ksmbd threads eating masses of cputime when connection is disconnected.
>> If connection is disconnected, ksmbd thread waits for pending requests
>> to be processed using schedule_timeout. schedule_timeout() incorrectly
>> is used, and it is more efficient to use wait_event/wake_up than to check
>> r_count every time with timeout.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  fs/ksmbd/connection.c |  6 +++---
>>  fs/ksmbd/connection.h |  1 +
>>  fs/ksmbd/oplock.c     | 21 ++++++++++-----------
>>  fs/ksmbd/server.c     |  1 +
>>  4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/connection.c b/fs/ksmbd/connection.c
>> index ce23cc89046e..756ad631c019 100644
>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/connection.c
>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/connection.c
>> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct ksmbd_conn *ksmbd_conn_alloc(void)
>>         conn->outstanding_credits = 0;
>>
>>         init_waitqueue_head(&conn->req_running_q);
>> +       init_waitqueue_head(&conn->r_count_q);
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->conns_list);
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->requests);
>>         INIT_LIST_HEAD(&conn->async_requests);
>> @@ -165,7 +166,6 @@ int ksmbd_conn_write(struct ksmbd_work *work)
>>         struct kvec iov[3];
>>         int iov_idx = 0;
>>
>> -       ksmbd_conn_try_dequeue_request(work);
>>         if (!work->response_buf) {
>>                 pr_err("NULL response header\n");
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>> @@ -347,8 +347,8 @@ int ksmbd_conn_handler_loop(void *p)
>>
>>  out:
>>         /* Wait till all reference dropped to the Server object*/
>> -       while (atomic_read(&conn->r_count) > 0)
>> -               schedule_timeout(HZ);
>> +       wait_event(conn->r_count_q, atomic_read(&conn->r_count) == 0);
>> +
>>
>>         unload_nls(conn->local_nls);
>>         if (default_conn_ops.terminate_fn)
>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/connection.h b/fs/ksmbd/connection.h
>> index 5b39f0bdeff8..2e4730457c92 100644
>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/connection.h
>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/connection.h
>> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ struct ksmbd_conn {
>>         unsigned int                    outstanding_credits;
>>         spinlock_t                      credits_lock;
>>         wait_queue_head_t               req_running_q;
>> +       wait_queue_head_t               r_count_q;
>>         /* Lock to protect requests list*/
>>         spinlock_t                      request_lock;
>>         struct list_head                requests;
>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c b/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c
>> index 8b5560574d4c..9bb4fb8b80de 100644
>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c
>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/oplock.c
>> @@ -615,18 +615,13 @@ static void __smb2_oplock_break_noti(struct
>> work_struct *wk)
>>         struct ksmbd_file *fp;
>>
>>         fp = ksmbd_lookup_durable_fd(br_info->fid);
>> -       if (!fp) {
>> -               atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
>> -               ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
>> -               return;
>> -       }
>> +       if (!fp)
>> +               goto out;
>>
>>         if (allocate_oplock_break_buf(work)) {
>>                 pr_err("smb2_allocate_rsp_buf failed! ");
>> -               atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
>>                 ksmbd_fd_put(work, fp);
>> -               ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
>> -               return;
>> +               goto out;
>>         }
>>
>>         rsp_hdr = smb2_get_msg(work->response_buf);
>> @@ -667,8 +662,11 @@ static void __smb2_oplock_break_noti(struct
>> work_struct *wk)
>>
>>         ksmbd_fd_put(work, fp);
>>         ksmbd_conn_write(work);
>> +
>> +out:
>>         ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
>>         atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
>> +       wake_up_all(&conn->r_count_q);
>
> I think calling wake_up_all is better if atomic_dec_return(&conn->r_count)
> == 0.
Are there cases where r_count inc/dec doesn't pair?

> Otherwise, Looks good to me.
>
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> @@ -731,9 +729,7 @@ static void __smb2_lease_break_noti(struct work_struct
>> *wk)
>>
>>         if (allocate_oplock_break_buf(work)) {
>>                 ksmbd_debug(OPLOCK, "smb2_allocate_rsp_buf failed! ");
>> -               ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
>> -               atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
>> -               return;
>> +               goto out;
>>         }
>>
>>         rsp_hdr = smb2_get_msg(work->response_buf);
>> @@ -771,8 +767,11 @@ static void __smb2_lease_break_noti(struct
>> work_struct *wk)
>>         inc_rfc1001_len(work->response_buf, 44);
>>
>>         ksmbd_conn_write(work);
>> +
>> +out:
>>         ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
>>         atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
>> +       wake_up_all(&conn->r_count_q);
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/server.c b/fs/ksmbd/server.c
>> index 4cd03d661df0..dfddc8dc1919 100644
>> --- a/fs/ksmbd/server.c
>> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/server.c
>> @@ -262,6 +262,7 @@ static void handle_ksmbd_work(struct work_struct *wk)
>>         ksmbd_conn_try_dequeue_request(work);
>>         ksmbd_free_work_struct(work);
>>         atomic_dec(&conn->r_count);
>> +       wake_up_all(&conn->r_count_q);
>>  }
>>
>>  /**
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Hyunchul
>




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux