Re: xfstests passed for current mainline against current ksmbd-for-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfstests passed for current mainline against current ksmbd-for-next
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2022 13:04:36 +0900
Cc: CIFS <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAH2r5muLr-UKAhcoP-s2Hn=U=Hbe2PtTLKODD+biSzQS8FkfZg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH2r5muLr-UKAhcoP-s2Hn=U=Hbe2PtTLKODD+biSzQS8FkfZg@mail.gmail.com>

2022-05-29 12:53 GMT+09:00, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>:
> http://smb3-test-rhel-75.southcentralus.cloudapp.azure.com/#/builders/8/builds/108
Thanks for your test!

>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xfstests passed for current mainline against current ksmbd-for-next
  - From: Steve French

References:
- xfstests passed for current mainline against current ksmbd-for-next
  - From: Steve French

Prev by Date: xfstests passed for current mainline against current ksmbd-for-next
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] cifs: set length when cifs_copy_pages_to_iter is successful
Previous by thread: xfstests passed for current mainline against current ksmbd-for-next
Next by thread: Re: xfstests passed for current mainline against current ksmbd-for-next
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux