Re: Regarding to how ksmbd handles sector size request from windows cllient

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Tom Talpey <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Regarding to how ksmbd handles sector size request from windows cllient
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 21:06:57 -0700
Cc: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>, CIFS <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hyeoncheol Lee <hyc.lee@xxxxxxxxx>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <84c7d6a4-f3e8-420e-828c-5852e21f1b08@talpey.com>
References: <CAKYAXd_XMW1-VSLwB=k3ypqgqjsux5OFNnr=Ri3B+-8w4aNHjw@mail.gmail.com> <63afe0cd-7151-45e6-a7c2-2eb9212d721b@talpey.com> <CAKYAXd-G-NnN+1Ex2JcRJ_PDADV3PbyfRQ=qsoQ6TDq=RdHmvQ@mail.gmail.com> <84c7d6a4-f3e8-420e-828c-5852e21f1b08@talpey.com>

Leave is as-is.  128kb is not a valid sector size in Linux to start
with.  That is what people get for using weird out of tree crap.

References:
- Regarding to how ksmbd handles sector size request from windows cllient
  - From: Namjae Jeon
- Re: Regarding to how ksmbd handles sector size request from windows cllient
  - From: Tom Talpey
- Re: Regarding to how ksmbd handles sector size request from windows cllient
  - From: Namjae Jeon
- Re: Regarding to how ksmbd handles sector size request from windows cllient
  - From: Tom Talpey

Prev by Date: Re: Regarding to how ksmbd handles sector size request from windows cllient
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/2] cifs: fix potential race with cifsd thread
Previous by thread: Re: Regarding to how ksmbd handles sector size request from windows cllient
Next by thread: [linux-next:master] BUILD REGRESSION a67ba3cf9551f8c92d5ec9d7eae1aadbb9127b57
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux