Hi
2022. február 28., hétfő 23:28 keltezéssel, James Bottomley írta:
> [...]
> Well, yes, but my objection is more to the size of churn than the
> desire to do loop local. I'm not even sure loop local is possible,
> because it's always annoyed me that for (int i = 0; ... in C++ defines
> i in the outer scope not the loop scope, which is why I never use it.
It is arguably off-topic to the discussion at hand, but I think you might be
thinking of something else (or maybe it was the case in an ancient version of C++)
because that does not appear to be case. If it were,
for (int i ...) { ... }
for (int i ...) { ... }
would have to trigger a redeclaration error, but that happens neither in C++ nor in C.
The variable is also inaccessible outside the loop.
> [...]
Regards,
Barnabás Pőcze
