Hi David, Do you mean the clamp handler in netfs should return the size of data to be allocated instead of allocating itself ? Regards, Rohith On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 2:56 AM David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Rohith Surabattula <rohiths.msft@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > + credits = kmalloc(sizeof(struct cifs_credits), GFP_KERNEL); > > ... > > + subreq->subreq_priv = credits; > > Would it be better if I made it so that the netfs could specify the size of > the netfs_read_subrequest struct to be allocated, thereby allowing it to tag > extra data on the end? > > David >
