Re: Fwd: [RFC PATCH] fscache, 9p, afs, cifs, nfs: Deal with some warnings from W=1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [RFC PATCH] fscache, 9p, afs, cifs, nfs: Deal with some warnings from W=1
From: David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 09:46:24 +0100
Cc: dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx, CIFS <linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CAH2r5mvKm265qyfx4Ev3emQ9rF-pvHhLQYs2YkJ=u+LmKJwbXA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
References: <CAH2r5mvKm265qyfx4Ev3emQ9rF-pvHhLQYs2YkJ=u+LmKJwbXA@mail.gmail.com> <163214005516.2945267.7000234432243167892.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>

Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Updated patch (just including the cifs change) to avoid merge conflicts.
> 
> Tentatively merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next

I see your W=1 changes got merged and all my cifs bits are now gone.

David

References:
- Fwd: [RFC PATCH] fscache, 9p, afs, cifs, nfs: Deal with some warnings from W=1
  - From: Steve French
- [RFC PATCH] fscache, 9p, afs, cifs, nfs: Deal with some warnings from W=1
  - From: David Howells

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: rename cifs_common to smbfs_common in cifs and ksmbd entry
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] ksmbd: a bunch of patches
Previous by thread: Fwd: [RFC PATCH] fscache, 9p, afs, cifs, nfs: Deal with some warnings from W=1
Next by thread: [PATCH][ksmbd] log that module is experimental at load time
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux