On (21/09/07 17:09), Namjae Jeon wrote:
> 2021-09-07 17:01 GMT+09:00, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > On (21/09/07 10:33), Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >>
> >> Smatch complains that there are some paths where "rc" is not set.
> >>
> >> Fixes: eb5784f0c6ef ("ksmbd: ensure error is surfaced in
> >> set_file_basic_info()")
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
> >> index a350e1cef7f4..c86164dc70bb 100644
> >> --- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
> >> +++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
> >> @@ -5444,7 +5444,7 @@ static int set_file_basic_info(struct ksmbd_file
> >> *fp, char *buf,
> >> struct file *filp;
> >> struct inode *inode;
> >> struct user_namespace *user_ns;
> >> - int rc;
> >> + int rc = 0;
> >>
> >> if (!(fp->daccess & FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES_LE))
> >> return -EACCES;
> >
> > It sort of feels like that `rc' is not needed there at all. It's being used
> > in
> >
> > rc = ksmbd_vfs_set_dos_attrib_xattr(user_ns,
> > filp->f_path.dentry,
> > &da);
> > if (rc)
> > ksmbd_debug(SMB,
> > "failed to restore file attribute in
> > EA\n");
> >
> > and in
> >
> > rc = setattr_prepare(user_ns, dentry, &attrs);
> > if (rc)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Either it should be used more, and probably be a return value, or we can
> > just remove it.
> This patch is correct. But I have already fixed it.
> You can understand it if you check #ksmbd-for-next branch, not master.
>
> https://git.samba.org/?p=ksmbd.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ksmbd-for-next
I assume it's "ksmbd: ensure error is surfaced in set_file_basic_info()"
If none of the branches that set `rc' is taken then function returns
random stack value:
---
int rc;
if (test_share_config_flag(share, KSMBD_SHARE_FLAG_STORE_DOS_ATTRS) ... {
rc = ...
}
if (attrs.ia_valid) .... {
rc = ...
}
return rc;
---
