We should probably put a few lines in the cifsd and cifs client wiki pages on samba.org and also in the kernel documentation directory for each that notes that emails with patches should have a prefix that indicates whether server or client or utils (e.g. [cifsd] or [ksmbd] if you prefer, [cifs] for the client and [cifs-utils] for the tools) On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 9:41 PM Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Add CC: Steve, Ronnie, Aurélien. > > > Any opinions? > > > > I think having only one list would be nice too, but we should ask/document to put a [cifsd] tag > > somewhere in the subject, which is hard to enforce. > > > > Case in point, it already gets confusing when people send patches for > > cifs-utils: we can't always tell it's not for the kernel from the subject which can confuse people and > > scripts. > Thanks for your opinion! > I will change to specify single list(linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) in MAINTAINERS. > > > Cheers, > > -- > > Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team > > GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, > > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE > > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München) > > -- Thanks, Steve
