RE: ksmbd and reflink support - enables many more functional tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Steve,
> 
> Did a run of reflink dependent xfstests against ksmbd (from current 5.13-rc2 linux client) and see a
> very promising number (35+) of new tests that we should be able to enable.  See below:
Thanks for your check!
> 
> generic/110 0s ...  0s
> generic/111 0s ...  0s
> generic/115 0s ...  0s
> generic/116 0s ...  1s
> generic/118 0s ...  0s
> generic/119 1s ...  0s
> generic/134 1s ...  1s
> generic/138 0s ...  0s
> generic/139 1s ...  1s
> generic/140 0s ...  0s
> generic/142 1s ...  2s
> generic/143 2s ...  1s
> generic/144 1s ...  1s
> generic/146 1s ...  1s
> generic/148 1s ...  0s
> generic/149 0s ...  1s
> generic/150 1s ...  0s
> generic/151 0s ...  1s
> generic/152 1s ...  1s
> generic/153 0s ...  0s
> generic/154 1s ...  1s
> generic/155 0s ...  0s
> generic/161 1s ...  1s
> generic/164 8s ...  8s
> generic/165 9s ...  8s
> generic/166 6s ...  16s
> generic/167 5s ...  230s
> generic/168 46s ...  37s
> generic/170 44s ...  103s
> generic/175 7s
> generic/176 58s ...  50s
> generic/178 1s ...  0s
> generic/179 0s ...  1s
> generic/180 0s ...  0s
> 
> After test 180 (for tests 181, 183, 185 and following eg.) I got "could not connect to server" on all
> tests so ksmbd may have crashed at that point
Okay, I am trying to reproduce it.

Thanks!
> --
> Thanks,
> 
> Steve





[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux