testing results against current for-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



testing on current for-next (35 patches) looks good (other than an
intermittent problem seen occasionally in a couple multichannel tests
over the last few weeks - will be interesting if the multichannel
reconnect improvements suggested would help this)

http://smb3-test-rhel-75.southcentralus.cloudapp.azure.com/#/builders/2/builds/577

passes all tests now that one patch,

     "cifs: improve fallocate emulation"

was temporarily removed from for-next. That patch looks like the one
that had caused the regression over the past week (use of this patch
may have uncovered a copychunk bug) - so we need to dig into why this
patch breaks various xfstests.

-- 
Thanks,

Steve



[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux