Re: [PATCH 2/5] cifsd: add server-side procedures for SMB3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 23.03.2021 um 08:19 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:17:47AM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
+
+static int
+compare_oid(unsigned long *oid1, unsigned int oid1len,
+	    unsigned long *oid2, unsigned int oid2len) {
+	unsigned int i;
+
+	if (oid1len != oid2len)
+		return 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < oid1len; i++) {
+		if (oid1[i] != oid2[i])
+			return 0;
+	}
+	return 1;
+}
Call this oid_eq()?
Why not compare_oid()? This code is come from cifs.
I need clear reason to change both cifs/cifsd...

Boolean functions should tell you what they are testing in the name.
Without any context you can't know what if (compare_oid(one, two)) {
means, but if (oid_equal(one, two)) { is readable.

regards,
dan carpenter
ahm just a pointless comment. but
return !memcmp(oid1,oid2, sizeof(long*)*oid1len);
looks much more efficient than this "for" loop






[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux