Re: [PATCH v4] flock.2: add CIFS details

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)" <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I agree with Tom.  It's much easier to read if you just say that 'nobrl' 
> torns off the non-locale behaviour, and acts as 5.4 and earlier kernels. 
>   Unless there's any subtlety that makes it different.  Is there any?

nobrl also makes fnctl() locks local.
In 5.4 and earlier kernel, flock() is local but fnctl() isn't.

> BTW, you should use "semantic newlines":

Ok, I'll redo once we agree on the text.

Cheers,
-- 
Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team
GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97  8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, DE
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 247165 (AG München)





[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux