Re: [PATCH][SMB3] Handle STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT gracefully

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky

вс, 27 сент. 2020 г. в 20:41, Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:33 AM Rohith Surabattula
> <rohiths.msft@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > As this status code is returned when there is an internal
> > unavailability. So for any transaction, this status code can be
> > returned and EJUKEBOX check needs to be added at many places to
> > support this.
> >
> > Respined the patch with signoff flag and attached.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:42 AM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ronnie also mentioned EJUKEBOX as a possibly better error mapping to
> > > return (and then check for).  EJUKEBOX implies waiting and then
> > > backoff.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 1:20 AM ronnie sahlberg
> > > <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:08 PM rohiths msft <rohiths.msft@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > This fix is to handle STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT status code. This status code
> > > > > is returned by the server in case of unavailability(internal
> > > > > disconnects,etc) and is not treated by linux clients as retriable. So,
> > > > > this fix maps the status code as retriable error and also has a check
> > > > > to drop the connection to not overload the server.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do we need a new method for this? Wouldn't it be enough to just do the
> > > > remap-to-EAGAIN and have it handled as all other retryable errors?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Rohith
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Steve
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux