> Part of this makes sense Pavel reminded me:
> in cifs_writepages() we don't need to reference wdata because we
> are leaving the function. in cifs_write_from_iter() we put all wdatas
> in the list and that's why we need an extra reference there
Yes, this looks right. cifs_writev_requeue() seems to work like
cifs_writepages() in that the wdata2 reference disappears when the loop
exits. If the loop iterates a new struct is created each time.
> and wouldn't there be an underrun if a retryable error with your patch
> with it getting called twice?
There shouldn't be any difference if there is any kind of write error
(rc != 0), since the put call is just moving. The only difference
should be that the put call will happen if the write succeeds.
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:04:08PM -0500, Steve French wrote:
> Part of this makes sense Pavel reminded me:
> in cifs_writepages() we don't need to reference wdata because we
> are leaving the function. in cifs_write_from_iter() we put all wdatas
> in the list and that's why we need an extra reference there
>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 2:14 PM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Shyam and Pavel noticed things which didn't make sense
> >
> > e.g. in cifs_writepages weare putting the reference unconditionally
> > but in cifs_write_from_iter we are doing the same thing. So how was
> > this working before - should have resulted in a reference leak and
> > direct i/o shouldn't have had a chance to complete??
> >
> > and wouldn't there be an underrun if a retryable error with your patch
> > with it getting called twice?
> >
> > Jeff,
> > Any thoughts on this?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 6:55 AM Adam McCoy <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Failed async writes that are requeued may not clean up a refcount
> > > on the file, which can result in a leaked open. This scenario arises
> > > very reliably when using persistent handles and a reconnect occurs
> > > while writing.
> > >
> > > cifs_writev_requeue only releases the reference if the write fails
> > > (rc != 0). The server->ops->async_writev operation will take its own
> > > reference, so the initial reference can always be released.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adam McCoy <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 2 +-
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> > > index 182b864b3075..5014a82391ff 100644
> > > --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> > > +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> > > @@ -2152,8 +2152,8 @@ cifs_writev_requeue(struct cifs_writedata *wdata)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + kref_put(&wdata2->refcount, cifs_writedata_release);
> > > if (rc) {
> > > - kref_put(&wdata2->refcount, cifs_writedata_release);
> > > if (is_retryable_error(rc))
> > > continue;
> > > i += nr_pages;
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Steve
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
