пт, 25 окт. 2019 г. в 13:52, Frank Sorenson <sorenson@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> fI'm testing out multiple processes simultaneously doing an
> open/read/write/close of the same file + smb restart test (next step
> after the open/read/close + smb restart), and I'm hitting a different hang.
>
> It's a bit more complex, so I haven't been able to unravel it like the
> other hangs.
>
> I'm using upstream 531e93d11470 with additional patches to fix the
> recent crashes and deadlocks that the multiple-process open/read/close +
> smb restart test hits:
>
> Author: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2019-10-23 15:55:40 -0700
>
> CIFS: Fix use after free of file info structures
>
> Author: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2019-10-22 15:35:34 -0700
>
> CIFS: Fix retry mid list corruption on reconnects
>
> Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 2019-10-23 22:08:22 -0400
>
> cifs: Fix cifsInodeInfo lock_sem deadlock when reconnect occurs
>
>
> (I've hit this hang both with and without the 'lock_sem deadlock' patch,
> so at least the patch does not make things worse)
>
>
> on the client, I'm running 50 processes:
> fd = open(testfile_path, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0644)
> read(fd, buf, 32768);
> write(fd, testfile_path, strlen(testfile_path);
> close(fd);
>
> on smb server (once):
> systemctl restart smb.service
>
>
>
> there are 6 processes looping to while trying to down_write
> cinode->lock_sem, 5 of them from _cifsFileInfo_put, and one from
> cifs_new_fileinfo
>
> and there are 5 other processes which are blocked, several of them
> waiting on either PG_writeback or PG_locked (which are both set), all
> for the same page of the file
>
> 2 inode_lock() (inode->i_rwsem) for the file
> 1 wait_on_page_writeback() for the page
> 1 down_read(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> 1 inode_lock()(inode->i_rwsem) for the inode of the directory
> 1 __lock_page
>
>
> so processes are blocked waiting on:
> page flags PG_locked and PG_writeback for one specific page
> inode->i_rwsem for the directory
> inode->i_rwsem for the file
> cifsInodeInfo->lock_sem
>
>
>
> here are the more gory details (let me know if I need to provide
> anything more/better):
>
> [0 00:48:22.765] [UN] PID: 8863 TASK: ffff8c691547c5c0 CPU: 3
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965007e3ba8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965007e3c38] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965007e3c48] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> #3 [ffff9965007e3cb8] legitimize_path at ffffffff9b0f975d
> #4 [ffff9965007e3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe55d
> #5 [ffff9965007e3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> #6 [ffff9965007e3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> #7 [ffff9965007e3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
> * (I think legitimize_path is bogus)
>
> in path_openat
> } else {
> const char *s = path_init(nd, flags);
> while (!(error = link_path_walk(s, nd)) &&
> (error = do_last(nd, file, op)) > 0) { <<<<
>
> do_last:
> if (open_flag & O_CREAT)
> inode_lock(dir->d_inode); <<<<
> else
> so it's trying to take inode->i_rwsem for the directory
>
> DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> ffff8c68bb8e79c0 ffff8c691158ef20 ffff8c6915bf9000 DIR /mnt/vm1_smb/
> inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c691158efc0
>
> <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c691158efc0>:
> owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914275d00> (UN - 8856 -
> reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> waitlist: 2
> 0xffff9965007e3c90 8863 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.926
> RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
> 0xffff996500393e00 9802 ls UN 0 1:17:26.700
> RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ
>
>
> the owner of the inode.i_rwsem of the directory is:
>
> [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8856 TASK: ffff8c6914275d00 CPU: 3
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff99650065b828] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff99650065b8b8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff99650065b8c8] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> #3 [ffff99650065b940] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> #4 [ffff99650065b948] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs]
> #5 [ffff99650065ba38] cifs_writepage_locked at ffffffffc0a0b8f3 [cifs]
> #6 [ffff99650065bab0] cifs_launder_page at ffffffffc0a0bb72 [cifs]
> #7 [ffff99650065bb30] invalidate_inode_pages2_range at ffffffff9b04d4bd
> #8 [ffff99650065bcb8] cifs_invalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a11339 [cifs]
> #9 [ffff99650065bcd0] cifs_revalidate_mapping at ffffffffc0a1139a [cifs]
> #10 [ffff99650065bcf0] cifs_d_revalidate at ffffffffc0a014f6 [cifs]
> #11 [ffff99650065bd08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe7f7
> #12 [ffff99650065bdd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> #13 [ffff99650065bee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> #14 [ffff99650065bf38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> cifs_launder_page is for page 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
>
> crash> page.index,mapping,flags 0xffffd1e2c07d2480
> index = 0x8
> mapping = 0xffff8c68f3cd0db0
> flags = 0xfffffc0008095
>
> PAGE-FLAG BIT VALUE
> PG_locked 0 0000001
> PG_uptodate 2 0000004
> PG_lru 4 0000010
> PG_waiters 7 0000080
> PG_writeback 15 0008000
>
>
> inode is ffff8c68f3cd0c40
> inode.i_rwsem is ffff8c68f3cd0ce0
> DENTRY INODE SUPERBLK TYPE PATH
> ffff8c68a1f1b480 ffff8c68f3cd0c40 ffff8c6915bf9000 REG
> /mnt/vm1_smb/testfile.8853
>
>
> this process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the parent directory, is
> laundering a page attached to the inode of the file it's opening, and in
> _cifsFileInfo_put is trying to down_write the cifsInodeInfo->lock_sem
> for the file itself.
>
>
> <struct rw_semaphore 0xffff8c68f3cd0ce0>:
> owner: <struct task_struct 0xffff8c6914272e80> (UN - 8854 -
> reopen_file), counter: 0x0000000000000003
> waitlist: 1
> 0xffff9965005dfd80 8855 reopen_file UN 0 1:29:22.912
> RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE
>
> this is the inode.i_rwsem for the file
>
> the owner:
>
> [0 00:48:22.739] [UN] PID: 8854 TASK: ffff8c6914272e80 CPU: 2
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff99650054fb38] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff99650054fbc8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff99650054fbd8] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> #3 [ffff99650054fbe8] __lock_page at ffffffff9b03c56f
> #4 [ffff99650054fc80] pagecache_get_page at ffffffff9b03dcdf
> #5 [ffff99650054fcc0] grab_cache_page_write_begin at ffffffff9b03ef4c
> #6 [ffff99650054fcd0] cifs_write_begin at ffffffffc0a064ec [cifs]
> #7 [ffff99650054fd30] generic_perform_write at ffffffff9b03bba4
> #8 [ffff99650054fda8] __generic_file_write_iter at ffffffff9b04060a
> #9 [ffff99650054fdf0] cifs_strict_writev.cold.70 at ffffffffc0a4469b [cifs]
> #10 [ffff99650054fe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> #11 [ffff99650054fed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> #12 [ffff99650054ff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> #13 [ffff99650054ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> the process holds the inode->i_rwsem for the file to which it's writing,
> and is trying to __lock_page for the same page as in the other processes
>
>
> the other tasks:
> [0 00:00:00.028] [UN] PID: 8859 TASK: ffff8c6915479740 CPU: 2
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965007b39d8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965007b3a68] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965007b3a78] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> #3 [ffff9965007b3af0] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> #4 [ffff9965007b3af8] cifs_new_fileinfo.cold.61 at ffffffffc0a42a07 [cifs]
> #5 [ffff9965007b3b78] cifs_open at ffffffffc0a0709d [cifs]
> #6 [ffff9965007b3cd8] do_dentry_open at ffffffff9b0e9b7a
> #7 [ffff9965007b3d08] path_openat at ffffffff9b0fe34f
> #8 [ffff9965007b3dd8] do_filp_open at ffffffff9b100a33
> #9 [ffff9965007b3ee0] do_sys_open at ffffffff9b0eb2d6
> #10 [ffff9965007b3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> this is opening the file, and is trying to down_write cinode->lock_sem
>
>
> [0 00:00:00.041] [UN] PID: 8860 TASK: ffff8c691547ae80 CPU: 2
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> [0 00:00:00.057] [UN] PID: 8861 TASK: ffff8c6915478000 CPU: 3
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> [0 00:00:00.059] [UN] PID: 8858 TASK: ffff8c6914271740 CPU: 2
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> [0 00:00:00.109] [UN] PID: 8862 TASK: ffff8c691547dd00 CPU: 6
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965007c3c78] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965007c3d08] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965007c3d18] schedule_timeout at ffffffff9b6e9f89
> #3 [ffff9965007c3d90] msleep at ffffffff9af573a9
> #4 [ffff9965007c3d98] _cifsFileInfo_put.cold.63 at ffffffffc0a42dd6 [cifs]
> #5 [ffff9965007c3e88] cifs_close at ffffffffc0a07aaf [cifs]
> #6 [ffff9965007c3ea0] __fput at ffffffff9b0efa6e
> #7 [ffff9965007c3ee8] task_work_run at ffffffff9aef1614
> #8 [ffff9965007c3f20] exit_to_usermode_loop at ffffffff9ae03d6f
> #9 [ffff9965007c3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae0444c
>
> closing the file, and trying to down_write cifsi->lock_sem
>
>
> [0 00:48:22.839] [UN] PID: 8857 TASK: ffff8c6914270000 CPU: 7
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965006a7cc8] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965006a7d58] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965006a7d68] io_schedule at ffffffff9b6e68e2
> #3 [ffff9965006a7d78] wait_on_page_bit at ffffffff9b03cac6
> #4 [ffff9965006a7e10] __filemap_fdatawait_range at ffffffff9b03b028
> #5 [ffff9965006a7ed8] filemap_write_and_wait at ffffffff9b040165
> #6 [ffff9965006a7ef0] cifs_flush at ffffffffc0a0c2fa [cifs]
> #7 [ffff9965006a7f10] filp_close at ffffffff9b0e93f1
> #8 [ffff9965006a7f30] __x64_sys_close at ffffffff9b0e9a0e
> #9 [ffff9965006a7f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> in __filemap_fdatawait_range
> wait_on_page_writeback(page);
> for the same page of the file
>
>
>
> [0 00:48:22.718] [UN] PID: 8855 TASK: ffff8c69142745c0 CPU: 7
> COMMAND: "reopen_file"
> #0 [ffff9965005dfc98] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff9965005dfd28] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff9965005dfd38] rwsem_down_write_slowpath at ffffffff9af283d7
> #3 [ffff9965005dfdf0] cifs_strict_writev at ffffffffc0a0c40a [cifs]
> #4 [ffff9965005dfe48] new_sync_write at ffffffff9b0ec1dd
> #5 [ffff9965005dfed0] vfs_write at ffffffff9b0eed35
> #6 [ffff9965005dff00] ksys_write at ffffffff9b0eefd9
> #7 [ffff9965005dff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> inode_lock(inode);
>
>
> and one 'ls' later on, to see whether the rest of the mount is available
> (the test file is in the root, so we get blocked up on the directory
> ->i_rwsem), so the entire mount is unavailable
>
> [0 00:36:26.473] [UN] PID: 9802 TASK: ffff8c691436ae80 CPU: 4
> COMMAND: "ls"
> #0 [ffff996500393d28] __schedule at ffffffff9b6e6095
> #1 [ffff996500393db8] schedule at ffffffff9b6e64df
> #2 [ffff996500393dc8] rwsem_down_read_slowpath at ffffffff9b6e9421
> #3 [ffff996500393e78] down_read_killable at ffffffff9b6e95e2
> #4 [ffff996500393e88] iterate_dir at ffffffff9b103c56
> #5 [ffff996500393ec8] ksys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104b0c
> #6 [ffff996500393f30] __x64_sys_getdents64 at ffffffff9b104bb6
> #7 [ffff996500393f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff9ae04315
>
> in iterate_dir:
> if (shared)
> res = down_read_killable(&inode->i_rwsem); <<<<
> else
> res = down_write_killable(&inode->i_rwsem);
>
>
>
> mount looks like:
> 271 97 0:51 / /mnt/vm1_smb rw,relatime shared:143 - cifs //vm1/cifs
> rw,vers=2.1,sec=ntlmssp,cache=strict,username=user1,uid=0,noforceuid,gid=0,noforcegid,addr=192.168.122.73,file_mode=0755,dir_mode=0755,hard,nounix,serverino,mapposix,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,bsize=1048576,echo_interval=60,actimeo=1
>
>
>
> # cat /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData
> Display Internal CIFS Data Structures for Debugging
> ---------------------------------------------------
> CIFS Version 2.23
> Features:
> DFS,STATS2,DEBUG,ALLOW_INSECURE_LEGACY,WEAK_PW_HASH,CIFS_POSIX,UPCALL(SPNEGO),XATTR,ACL
> CIFSMaxBufSize: 16384
> Active VFS Requests: 2
> Servers:
> Number of credits: 241 Dialect 0x210
> 1) Name: 192.168.122.73 Uses: 1 Capability: 0x300007 Session Status: 1
> TCP status: 1 Instance: 3
> Local Users To Server: 1 SecMode: 0x1 Req On Wire: 0 In Send: 0 In
> MaxReq Wait: 0 SessionId: 0xd90a3306
> Shares:
> 0) IPC: \\vm1\IPC$ Mounts: 1 DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0x0
> PathComponentMax: 0 Status: 1 type: 0 Serial Number: 0x0
>
> 1) \\vm1\cifs Mounts: 1 DevInfo: 0x20 Attributes: 0x1006f
> PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 1 type: DISK Serial Number: 0x0
>
> MIDs:
>
>
> Frank
> --
> Frank Sorenson
> sorenson@xxxxxxxxxx
> Principal Software Maintenance Engineer
> Global Support Services - filesystems
> Red Hat
Hi Frank,
Thanks for the detailed analysis. So, there is a deadlock between a
page lock and a cinode->lock_sem.
It seems that the easiest fix would be to change all the places where
we use get/put reference to a file info to offload the last step (to
put a file info back) into a work queue, so, it can be lazily closed
from a separate process that doesn't hold other locks.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky
