reviewed-by me On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:59 PM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Updated patch > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 9:53 PM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Ok. Will fix the bool. I don't think it belongs in mount mask since it is a server not superblock parm > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019, 21:37 ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Change > >> bool ignore_signature; > >> to > >> bool ignore_signature:1; > >> > >> And shouldn't this be part of CIFS_MOUNT_MASK too ? > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:25 PM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > >> > Add new mount option "signloosely" which enables signing but skips the > >> > sometimes expensive signing checks in the responses (signatures are > >> > calculated and sent correctly in the SMB2/SMB3 requests even with this > >> > mount option but skipped in the responses). Although weaker for security > >> > (and also data integrity in case a packet were corrupted), this can provide > >> > enough of a performance benefit (calculating the signature to verify a > >> > packet can be expensive especially for large packets) to be useful in > >> > some cases. > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Thanks, > >> > > >> > Steve > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve
