Re: [PATCH v2] cifs: fix strcat buffer overflow and reduce raciness in smb21_set_oplock_level()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



at 02:28, Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

вт, 7 мая 2019 г. в 09:13, Steve French via samba-technical
<samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 10:17 AM Christoph Probst via samba-technical
<samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Change strcat to strncpy in the "None" case to fix a buffer overflow
when cinode->oplock is reset to 0 by another thread accessing the same
cinode. It is never valid to append "None" to any other message.

Consolidate multiple writes to cinode->oplock to reduce raciness.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Probst <kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
index c36ff0d..aa61dcf 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
@@ -2917,26 +2917,28 @@ smb21_set_oplock_level(struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode, __u32 oplock,
                       unsigned int epoch, bool *purge_cache)
 {
        char message[5] = {0};
+       unsigned int new_oplock = 0;

        oplock &= 0xFF;
        if (oplock == SMB2_OPLOCK_LEVEL_NOCHANGE)
                return;

-       cinode->oplock = 0;
        if (oplock & SMB2_LEASE_READ_CACHING_HE) {
-               cinode->oplock |= CIFS_CACHE_READ_FLG;
+               new_oplock |= CIFS_CACHE_READ_FLG;
                strcat(message, "R");
        }
        if (oplock & SMB2_LEASE_HANDLE_CACHING_HE) {
-               cinode->oplock |= CIFS_CACHE_HANDLE_FLG;
+               new_oplock |= CIFS_CACHE_HANDLE_FLG;
                strcat(message, "H");
        }
        if (oplock & SMB2_LEASE_WRITE_CACHING_HE) {
-               cinode->oplock |= CIFS_CACHE_WRITE_FLG;
+               new_oplock |= CIFS_CACHE_WRITE_FLG;
                strcat(message, "W");
        }
-       if (!cinode->oplock)
-               strcat(message, "None");
+       if (!new_oplock)
+               strncpy(message, "None", sizeof(message));
+
+       cinode->oplock = new_oplock;
        cifs_dbg(FYI, "%s Lease granted on inode %p\n", message,
                 &cinode->vfs_inode);
 }
--
2.1.4


Doesn’t the race still happen, but implicitly here?
cinode->oplock = new_oplock;

Is it possible to just introduce a lock to force its proper ordering?
e.g.

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index bf5b8264e119..a3c3c6156d17 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ cifs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
         * server, can not assume caching of file data or metadata.
         */
        cifs_set_oplock_level(cifs_inode, 0);
+       mutex_init(&cifs_inode->oplock_mutex);
        cifs_inode->flags = 0;
        spin_lock_init(&cifs_inode->writers_lock);
        cifs_inode->writers = 0;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
index 37b5ddf27ff1..6dfd4ab16c4f 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -1214,6 +1214,7 @@ struct cifsInodeInfo {
        struct list_head openFileList;
        __u32 cifsAttrs; /* e.g. DOS archive bit, sparse, compressed, system */
        unsigned int oplock;            /* oplock/lease level we have */
+       struct mutex oplock_mutex;
        unsigned int epoch;             /* used to track lease state changes */
 #define CIFS_INODE_PENDING_OPLOCK_BREAK   (0) /* oplock break in progress */
 #define CIFS_INODE_PENDING_WRITERS       (1) /* Writes in progress */
diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
index b20063cf774f..796b23712e71 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
@@ -1901,6 +1901,7 @@ smb21_set_oplock_level(struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode, __u32 oplock,
        if (oplock == SMB2_OPLOCK_LEVEL_NOCHANGE)
                return;

+       mutex_lock(&cinode->oplock_mutex);
        cinode->oplock = 0;
        if (oplock & SMB2_LEASE_READ_CACHING_HE) {
                cinode->oplock |= CIFS_CACHE_READ_FLG;
@@ -1916,6 +1917,8 @@ smb21_set_oplock_level(struct cifsInodeInfo *cinode, __u32 oplock,
        }
        if (!cinode->oplock)
                strcat(message, "None");
+       mutex_unlock(&cinode->oplock_mutex);
+
        cifs_dbg(FYI, "%s Lease granted on inode %p\n", message,
                 &cinode->vfs_inode);
 }

Kai-Heng

Thanks for cleaning it up!

Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky





[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux