Yes - it fixed 112 and 469 (the only two failing ones) http://smb3-test-rhel-75.southcentralus.cloudapp.azure.com/#/builders/4/builds/157 On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 12:29 PM Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ср, 1 мая 2019 г. в 22:53, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > For zero-range that also extend the file we were sending this as a > > compound of two different operations; a fsctl to set-zero-data for the range > > and then an additional set-info to extend the file size. > > This does not work for Azure since it does not support this fsctl which leads > > to fallocate(FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE) failing but still changing the file size. > > > > To fix this we un-compound this and send these two operations as separate > > commands, firsat one command to set-zero-data for the range and it this > > was successful we proceed to send a set-info to update the file size. > > > > This fixes xfstest generic/469 for Azure servers. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 54 +++++++----------------------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c > > index 9b7a2f448591..860dd1696830 100644 > > --- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c > > +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c > > @@ -2648,16 +2648,8 @@ static long smb3_zero_range(struct file *file, struct cifs_tcon *tcon, > > struct cifsInodeInfo *cifsi; > > struct cifsFileInfo *cfile = file->private_data; > > struct file_zero_data_information fsctl_buf; > > - struct smb_rqst rqst[2]; > > - int resp_buftype[2]; > > - struct kvec rsp_iov[2]; > > - struct kvec io_iov[SMB2_IOCTL_IOV_SIZE]; > > - struct kvec si_iov[1]; > > - unsigned int size[1]; > > - void *data[1]; > > long rc; > > unsigned int xid; > > - int num = 0, flags = 0; > > __le64 eof; > > > > xid = get_xid(); > > @@ -2684,22 +2676,11 @@ static long smb3_zero_range(struct file *file, struct cifs_tcon *tcon, > > fsctl_buf.FileOffset = cpu_to_le64(offset); > > fsctl_buf.BeyondFinalZero = cpu_to_le64(offset + len); > > > > - if (smb3_encryption_required(tcon)) > > - flags |= CIFS_TRANSFORM_REQ; > > - > > - memset(rqst, 0, sizeof(rqst)); > > - resp_buftype[0] = resp_buftype[1] = CIFS_NO_BUFFER; > > - memset(rsp_iov, 0, sizeof(rsp_iov)); > > - > > - > > - memset(&io_iov, 0, sizeof(io_iov)); > > - rqst[num].rq_iov = io_iov; > > - rqst[num].rq_nvec = SMB2_IOCTL_IOV_SIZE; > > - rc = SMB2_ioctl_init(tcon, &rqst[num++], cfile->fid.persistent_fid, > > - cfile->fid.volatile_fid, FSCTL_SET_ZERO_DATA, > > - true /* is_fctl */, (char *)&fsctl_buf, > > - sizeof(struct file_zero_data_information), > > - CIFSMaxBufSize); > > + rc = SMB2_ioctl(xid, tcon, cfile->fid.persistent_fid, > > + cfile->fid.volatile_fid, FSCTL_SET_ZERO_DATA, true, > > + (char *)&fsctl_buf, > > + sizeof(struct file_zero_data_information), > > + 0, NULL, NULL); > > if (rc) > > goto zero_range_exit; > > > > @@ -2707,33 +2688,12 @@ static long smb3_zero_range(struct file *file, struct cifs_tcon *tcon, > > * do we also need to change the size of the file? > > */ > > if (keep_size == false && i_size_read(inode) < offset + len) { > > - smb2_set_next_command(tcon, &rqst[0]); > > - > > - memset(&si_iov, 0, sizeof(si_iov)); > > - rqst[num].rq_iov = si_iov; > > - rqst[num].rq_nvec = 1; > > - > > eof = cpu_to_le64(offset + len); > > - size[0] = 8; /* sizeof __le64 */ > > - data[0] = &eof; > > - > > - rc = SMB2_set_info_init(tcon, &rqst[num++], > > - cfile->fid.persistent_fid, > > - cfile->fid.persistent_fid, > > - current->tgid, > > - FILE_END_OF_FILE_INFORMATION, > > - SMB2_O_INFO_FILE, 0, data, size); > > - smb2_set_related(&rqst[1]); > > + rc = SMB2_set_eof(xid, tcon, cfile->fid.persistent_fid, > > + cfile->fid.volatile_fid, cfile->pid, &eof); > > } > > > > - rc = compound_send_recv(xid, ses, flags, num, rqst, > > - resp_buftype, rsp_iov); > > - > > zero_range_exit: > > - SMB2_ioctl_free(&rqst[0]); > > - SMB2_set_info_free(&rqst[1]); > > - free_rsp_buf(resp_buftype[0], rsp_iov[0].iov_base); > > - free_rsp_buf(resp_buftype[1], rsp_iov[1].iov_base); > > free_xid(xid); > > if (rc) > > trace_smb3_zero_err(xid, cfile->fid.persistent_fid, tcon->tid, > > -- > > 2.13.6 > > > > Does it also fix test 112? > > -- > Best regards, > Pavel Shilovsky -- Thanks, Steve
