Re: [PATCH] cifs: fix credits leak for SMB1 oplock breaks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



чт, 25 апр. 2019 г. в 18:43, Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/cifsglob.h  |  1 +
>  fs/cifs/cifssmb.c   |  2 +-
>  fs/cifs/transport.c | 10 +++++-----
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> index 621640195713..7a65124f70f9 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
> @@ -1701,6 +1701,7 @@ static inline bool is_retryable_error(int error)
>
>  #define   CIFS_HAS_CREDITS 0x0400    /* already has credits */
>  #define   CIFS_TRANSFORM_REQ 0x0800    /* transform request before sending */
> +#define   CIFS_NO_SRV_RSP    0x1000    /* there is no server response */
>
>  /* Security Flags: indicate type of session setup needed */
>  #define   CIFSSEC_MAY_SIGN     0x00001
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> index f43747c062a7..6050851edcb8 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
> @@ -2540,7 +2540,7 @@ CIFSSMBLock(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
>
>         if (lockType == LOCKING_ANDX_OPLOCK_RELEASE) {
>                 /* no response expected */
> -               flags = CIFS_ASYNC_OP | CIFS_OBREAK_OP;
> +               flags = CIFS_NO_SRV_RSP | CIFS_ASYNC_OP | CIFS_OBREAK_OP;
>                 pSMB->Timeout = 0;
>         } else if (waitFlag) {
>                 flags = CIFS_BLOCKING_OP; /* blocking operation, no timeout */
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/transport.c b/fs/cifs/transport.c
> index 5c59c498f56a..5573e38b13f3 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/transport.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/transport.c
> @@ -1073,8 +1073,11 @@ compound_send_recv(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses,
>
>         mutex_unlock(&ses->server->srv_mutex);
>
> -       if (rc < 0) {
> -               /* Sending failed for some reason - return credits back */
> +       /*
> +        * If sending failed for some reason or it is an oplock break that we

probably indicate that it is SMB1 oplock break?

> +        * will not receive a response to - return credits back
> +        */
> +       if (rc < 0 || (flags & CIFS_NO_SRV_RSP)) {
>                 for (i = 0; i < num_rqst; i++)
>                         add_credits(ses->server, &credits[i], optype);

A no-op callback is still needed to be set here or above for
CIFS_NO_SRV_RSP requests. Otherwise we may end up adding credits
twice: here and in the demultiplex thread.

>                 goto out;
> @@ -1095,9 +1098,6 @@ compound_send_recv(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses,
>                 smb311_update_preauth_hash(ses, rqst[0].rq_iov,
>                                            rqst[0].rq_nvec);
>
> -       if ((flags & CIFS_TIMEOUT_MASK) == CIFS_ASYNC_OP)
> -               goto out;
> -
>         for (i = 0; i < num_rqst; i++) {
>                 rc = wait_for_response(ses->server, midQ[i]);
>                 if (rc != 0)
> --
> 2.13.6
>


--
Best regards,
Pavel Shilovsky




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux