Re: "Bad SMB2 signature for message" with kernel 5.0.0, works with 4.19.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Steve,

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:44 PM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Looks like you have "server signing = mandatory" in
> /etc/samba/smb.conf on the server.  Is that true?  That (in theory)
> should not work with guest according to the protocol specification but
> I am comparing with 4.19 behavior to see what changed (maybe we
> ignored 'sign' if guest?)

I have the defaults for samba 4.10:
root@ubuntu:~# testparm -sv|grep signing
Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf
Loaded services file OK.
Server role: ROLE_STANDALONE

client ipc signing = default
client signing = default
server signing = default

According to the manpage[1], "server signing = default" means:
"""
           By default, and when smb signing is set to default, smb
signing is required when server role is active directory domain
controller and disabled otherwise.
"""

So it should be disabled in this case.


1. https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smb.conf.5.html#idm8588



[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux