And DFS set of tests passed as well On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:26 PM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I also reran (directly on the buildbot) the subtests which seemed a > bit slower in that run earlier today - and most looked fine with > possible exception of test 112 which seems about 20% slower than I > would have expected. > > generic/001 163s > generic/024 12s > generic/100 278s > generic/112 319s > generic/117 141s > generic/124 49s > generic/129 530s > generic/133 454s > generic/198 3s > generic/247 95s > generic/249 2s > generic/285 8s > generic/286 30s > generic/310 311s > generic/406 4s > generic/432 3s > generic/524 16s > Ran: generic/001 generic/024 generic/100 generic/112 generic/117 > generic/124 generic/129 generic/133 generic/198 generic/247 > generic/249 generic/285 generic/286 generic/310 generic/406 > generic/432 generic/524 > Passed all 17 tests > > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 5:45 PM Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Moved the xfstest git branch back to December 6th (just before the > > testcase problem patch Xiaoli pointed out) - and cherrypicked tests > > 524 and 528. Looks like current for-next worked fine > > (http://smb3-test-rhel-75.southcentralus.cloudapp.azure.com/#/builders/4/builds/111). > > Will kick off the cifs-testing bucket later today. > > > > -- > > Thanks, > > > > Steve > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Steve -- Thanks, Steve
