пн, 11 февр. 2019 г. в 17:22, Hank Leininger <hlein@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On 2018-07-17, Alexander Bokovoy said: > > > > Right. I replaced rst2man in RST2MAN definition in Makefile.am by > > $(have_rst2man) and given that we only call for that when CONFIG_MAN > > is set, that should complete the change. > ... > >+ AC_CHECK_PROGS(have_rst2man, rst2man-3.6 rst2man-3.4 rst2man-3 rst2man, no) > > Some OS's (Gentoo Linux, possibly OSX?) install rst2man as rst2man.py. > > Please do: > > - AC_CHECK_PROGS(have_rst2man, rst2man-3.6 rst2man-3.4 rst2man-3 rst2man, no) > + AC_CHECK_PROGS(have_rst2man, rst2man-3.6 rst2man-3.4 rst2man-3 rst2man.py rst2man, no) > > * I couldn't find a git repo where the above had actually landed? > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFS points to > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/LinuxCIFS_utils, which points to > git://git.samba.org/cifs-utils.git, which has not gotten a commit > since 2018-07-10 (master) or 2018-07-15 (next), unless I am just dumb. > Hi Hank, The repository is currently here: https://github.com/piastry/cifs-utils/commits/next The master branch on git.samba.org will be updated once I make a release. Feel free to submit a patch on top of the "next" branch. -- Best regards, Pavel Shilovsky
