Re: [PATCH -next] cifs: Use GFP_ATOMIC when a lock is held in cifs_mount()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On December 17, 2018 11:34:39 PM GMT-02:00, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>A spin lock is held before kstrndup, it may sleep with holding
>the spinlock, so we should use GFP_ATOMIC instead.
>
>Fixes: e58c31d5e387 ("cifs: Add support for failover in
>cifs_reconnect()")
>Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
>---
> fs/cifs/connect.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/fs/cifs/connect.c b/fs/cifs/connect.c
>index a83aa61..3d5e308 100644
>--- a/fs/cifs/connect.c
>+++ b/fs/cifs/connect.c
>@@ -4574,7 +4574,8 @@ int cifs_mount(struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
>struct smb_vol *vol)
> 		tcon->remap = cifs_remap(cifs_sb);
> 	}
> 	cifs_sb->origin_fullpath = kstrndup(tcon->dfs_path,
>-					    strlen(tcon->dfs_path), GFP_KERNEL);
>+					    strlen(tcon->dfs_path),
>+					    GFP_ATOMIC);
> 	if (!cifs_sb->origin_fullpath) {
> 		spin_unlock(&cifs_tcp_ses_lock);
> 		rc = -ENOMEM;

Reviewed-by: Paulo Alcantara <palcantara@xxxxxxx>

Thanks
Paulo
-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.




[Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux