Tom Talpey <ttalpey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I think it's a mistake to name anything beginning with "cifs" in > today's world. I suggest "smbfileinfo". But isn't this really just > an extended version of stat(1)? Would a name in line with that > usage be more appropriate? Yes cifsstat or smbstat sounds a lot better indeed. As for cifs vs smb, unfortunately "cifs" is used *everywhere* in the cifs-utils package. The name, the utilities name, the man pages, configure options, etc. I've tried to use SMB in the man page but it makes the package a bit inconsistent. Ideally we should rename everything but that's going to break a lot of stuff downstream. Cheers, -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
