Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> * nostrictsync: why would you need that and how can it be correct? > > Some servers do non-buffered writes by default, so there is no need to > ping them one more time for Flush. E.g. for in workloads when a client > is doing a lot of small write + fsync combinations and network latency > is much higher than a server latency, this would bring 2x performance > improvement. Or there might be a scenario when we want to avoid syncs > choosing performance over consistency. Makes more sense, thanks for the explanation. Btw, as it is now, the next branch has RDMA documented twice from 2 different commits. Cheers, -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
