On 5/30/2018 3:47 PM, Long Li wrote:
From: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add a function to allocate wdata without allocating pages for data
transfer. This gives the caller an option to pass a number of pages that
point to the data buffer to write to.
wdata is reponsible for free those pages after it's done.
Same comment as for the earlier patch. "Caller" is responsible for
"freeing" those pages? Confusing, as worded.
Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/cifs/cifsglob.h | 2 +-
fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 2 ++
fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
index 56864a87..7f62c98 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsglob.h
@@ -1205,7 +1205,7 @@ struct cifs_writedata {
unsigned int tailsz;
unsigned int credits;
unsigned int nr_pages;
- struct page *pages[];
+ struct page **pages;
Also same comment as for earlier patch, these are syntactically
equivalent and maybe not needed to change.
};
/*
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
index 1f27d8e..7933c5f 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h
@@ -533,6 +533,8 @@ int cifs_async_writev(struct cifs_writedata *wdata,
void cifs_writev_complete(struct work_struct *work);
struct cifs_writedata *cifs_writedata_alloc(unsigned int nr_pages,
work_func_t complete);
+struct cifs_writedata *cifs_writedata_direct_alloc(struct page **pages,
+ work_func_t complete);
void cifs_writedata_release(struct kref *refcount);
int cifs_query_mf_symlink(unsigned int xid, struct cifs_tcon *tcon,
struct cifs_sb_info *cifs_sb,
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
index c8e4278..5aca336 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c
@@ -1952,6 +1952,7 @@ cifs_writedata_release(struct kref *refcount)
if (wdata->cfile)
cifsFileInfo_put(wdata->cfile);
+ kvfree(wdata->pages);
kfree(wdata);
}
@@ -2075,12 +2076,22 @@ cifs_writev_complete(struct work_struct *work)
struct cifs_writedata *
cifs_writedata_alloc(unsigned int nr_pages, work_func_t complete)
{
+ struct page **pages =
+ kzalloc(sizeof(struct page *) * nr_pages, GFP_NOFS);
Why do you do a GFP_NOFS here but GFP_KERNEL in the earlier patch?
+ if (pages)
+ return cifs_writedata_direct_alloc(pages, complete);
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+struct cifs_writedata *
+cifs_writedata_direct_alloc(struct page **pages, work_func_t complete)
+{
struct cifs_writedata *wdata;
- /* writedata + number of page pointers */
- wdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*wdata) +
- sizeof(struct page *) * nr_pages, GFP_NOFS);
+ wdata = kzalloc(sizeof(*wdata), GFP_NOFS);
if (wdata != NULL) {
+ wdata->pages = pages;
kref_init(&wdata->refcount);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wdata->list);
init_completion(&wdata->done);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
