Isn't test 67 a skip not a success? On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Aurélien Aptel <aaptel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've run xfstests on Steve's for-next against a Windows Server 2016 > share. I've used this xfstests patch [1] to add a cifs-quick test group > (adapted patch that applies on xfstests master attached). > > Results are attached. > > I've only looked into generic/023 failure so far: > > - output mismatch (see /tests/xfstests/results//generic/023.out.bad) > --- tests/generic/023.out 2016-09-09 19:33:24.000000000 +0000 > +++ /tests/xfstests/results//generic/023.out.bad 2018-05-03 13:02:21.625014529 +0000 > @@ -18,12 +18,12 @@ > samedir dire/regu -> Not a directory > samedir dire/symb -> Not a directory > samedir dire/dire -> none/dire. > -samedir dire/tree -> Directory not empty > +samedir dire/tree -> Permission denied > samedir tree/none -> none/tree. > samedir tree/regu -> Not a directory > > It seems renaming a directory to an existing tree (dir + sub files) > fails with EACCESS instead of EEXISTS or ENOTEMPTY. > > I think Ronnie already tried to fix this here: > > http://marc.info/?i=20171109235249.8013-1-lsahlber@xxxxxxxxxx > > 1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844831/ > > > -- > Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team > GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 > SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) > -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
