On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Long Li via samba-technical <samba-technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Subject: RE: [Patch v2 2/6] cifs: Allocate validate negotiation request through >> kmalloc >> >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: linux-rdma-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-rdma- >> > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Long Li >> > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 2:17 PM >> > To: Steve French <sfrench@xxxxxxxxx>; linux-cifs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> > samba- technical@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >> > rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Cc: longli <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Subject: [Patch v2 2/6] cifs: Allocate validate negotiation request >> > through kmalloc >> > >> > From: Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > The data buffer allocated on the stack can't be DMA'ed, and hence >> > can't send through RDMA via SMB Direct. >> > >> > Fix this by allocating the request on the heap in smb3_validate_negotiate. >> > >> > Fixes: ff1c038addc4f205d5f1ede449426c7d316c0eed "Check SMB3 dialects >> > against downgrade attacks" >> > >> >> Format is: >> Fixes: ff1c038addc4 ("Check SMB3 dialects against downgrade attacks") It >> should be right above Signed-off signature. > > I will fix up and resend this patch. > > How about the rest patches (1, 3-6) in the series? If they don't need any changes, is it okay that I resend this one only? Doesn't matter to me either way - I already merged patch 1 in any case. >> > Changes in v2: >> > Removed duplicated code on freeing buffers on function exit. >> > (Thanks to Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxxxx>) -- Thanks, Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
