Long Li <longli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I tried to apply your patch to for-next, but it couldn't apply. > > I was using the for-next branch of > git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git > > Is this the branch this patch is rebased for? It should be yes, strange. I've just tried again and it worked. $ git branch -vvv | grep '*' * for-next 13b8cb522ed3 [sfrench/for-next] [SMB3] fix smb3-encryption breakage when CONFIG_DEBUG_SG=y $ git remote -v | grep sfrench sfrench git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git (fetch) sfrench git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6.git (push) You should probably wait for Ronnie's next version anyway. > This is wrong. rq_nvec should be 1. I’m wondering why it didn't panic > in your test. Have you tried testing with memory debugging on? I supose it didn't panic because I only used plain tcp and no async io. It was just a simple mount+ls test. Cheers, -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97 8C99 03C8 A49B 521B D5D3 SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-cifs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
